Thilina Gunarathne
2007-11-22 16:11:17 UTC
Hi Ruwan,
interfaces given by Rhino. So IMHO if our E4X fails (given that it's *properly integrated*) with
BSF, then our E4X implementation is missing something which original Rhino E4X impl had. Please log
issues about such things. We need to get them fixed ASAP. We never know when that case (if there is
any) would come across in the mashup server it self.
Before integrating Axiom E4X to Mashup, we got hold of the original Rhino E4X test suite and ran it
against our Axiom E4X, which helped us fix lot of issues. I think it'll be a good idea to run it
again with the current version.
thanks,
Thilina
We came across a number of issues with BSF when putting E4X for synapse
1.0 release, and did not had much time to put it in for the 1.1 release
since we got the BSF jars just before the release
AFAIK BSF works on top of Rhino when it comes to javascript. E4X implementation is a layer below the1.0 release, and did not had much time to put it in for the 1.1 release
since we got the BSF jars just before the release
interfaces given by Rhino. So IMHO if our E4X fails (given that it's *properly integrated*) with
BSF, then our E4X implementation is missing something which original Rhino E4X impl had. Please log
issues about such things. We need to get them fixed ASAP. We never know when that case (if there is
any) would come across in the mashup server it self.
Before integrating Axiom E4X to Mashup, we got hold of the original Rhino E4X test suite and ran it
against our Axiom E4X, which helped us fix lot of issues. I think it'll be a good idea to run it
again with the current version.
thanks,
Thilina
Thanks,
Ruwan
Ruwan